Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Phillips v. Hackett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 2015No. SD 33760PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DON E. BURRELL, P.J. — OPINION AUTHOR

Stacey Phillips (“Relator”), the plaintiff in a product liability suit, seeks a writ of prohibition against the Honorable James A. Hackett (“Respondent”) that would prevent Respondent from enforcing an order that Relator produce certain of her psychological-treatment records. Relator claims that the records in question are immune from discovery based on the physician-patient privilege. See section 491.060(5).1 We agree with that claim and now make permanent our preliminary writ of prohibition.

Applicable Principles of Review and Governing Law

Rule…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Brandt v. PelicanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Dean v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Stecher v. DowdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Boone Retirement Center, Inc. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROBERT EDWARD SMITHMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State ex rel. Williams v. MuntonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API