State ex rel. Phillips v. Hackett
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DON E. BURRELL, P.J. — OPINION AUTHOR
Stacey Phillips (“Relator”), the plaintiff in a product liability suit, seeks a writ of prohibition against the Honorable James A. Hackett (“Respondent”) that would prevent Respondent from enforcing an order that Relator produce certain of her psychological-treatment records. Relator claims that the records in question are immune from discovery based on the physician-patient privilege. See section 491.060(5).1 We agree with that claim and now make permanent our preliminary writ of prohibition.
Applicable Principles of Review and Governing Law
Rule…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Brandt v. PelicanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Stecher v. DowdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Boone Retirement Center, Inc. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROBERT EDWARD SMITHMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- State ex rel. Williams v. MuntonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017