Legal Opinion

Sharpe v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding to annul respondent’s determination, after a Tier III hearing, that he possessed a controlled substance in violation of inmate rule 113.12 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [iii]) and that he possessed drug paraphernalia in violation of the same rule. There is no merit to his contention that results of the Becton-Dickinson NIK tests were improperly admitted into evidence.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hillard v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Brooks v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Darnell v. KuhlmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. McGill v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gray v. KirkpatrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Crook v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API