Legal Opinion

Dakan v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1905No. Civ. No. 243PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. Lucas P. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.

Application for a writ of prohibition. The petitioner is the respondent in an action pending before the superior court in Santa Cruz county. Issues in the action were joined June 26, 1905, by his filing an answer to the complaint. The case appears to have been set down for trial for October 19th, and on that day, before the trial of the action, the defendant (petitioner herein) filed and served upon the plaintiff’s attorney a notice that he would make a motion before said court on October 27th for a change of the place of trial, upon the ground that the judge of said superior court is…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. State ex rel. Examining & Trial Board v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Skeen v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Eller v. SalatheWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Stuart v. EverlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API