Legal Opinion

Satkofsky v. Jarmulowsky

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the City Court' of the city of New York denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

The only question necessary to be considered upon this appeal is as to the validity of section 187 of the Municipal Court Act, giving the Municipal Court authority to make an order of interpleader. The argument in favor of the unconstitutionality of that section is ingenious, but not convincing. It rests entirely upon the assumption that the granting of an order of interpleader necessarily involves the exercise of equity jurisdiction. While there are phrases in certain opinions which, taken by themselves, seem to support this view, we do not consider that the authorities go to the whole…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Red Metal Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Englander v. FleckAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  3. Rogers v. Picken Realty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API