Legal Opinion

Smith v. Shuda

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

Defendant contends that she was not negligent in that she violated no duty owed to the plaintiff.

The trial court properly instructed the jury on duties of the inviter to provide a reasonably safe place and to warn of dangers not known by nor apparent to the invitee. Instructions were also given on the invitee’s duty to use reasonable care for her own safety.

As far as the negligence of defendant is concerned, she not only provided a waxed floor that constituted a hazard, but also actively provided and positioned a chair that would tip easily and directed that the plaintiff use it. The jury…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langworthy v. ReisingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schlicht v. ThesingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Voeltzke v. Kenosha Memorial Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Treps v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Schlicht v. ThesingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API