State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Bustos-Ramirez
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
There was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether Perez had a reasonable belief that he was entitled to use the Honda automobile owned by Ramirez. The trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff.
I. Factual and Procedural History
Augustine Perez (“Perez”) had resided with the family of Norberto Bustos-Ramirez (“Ramirez”) in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County for several years. Ramirez was the owner of a 1999 Honda Civic automobile which was insured by plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). On the night of 10 January…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Newell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Miller v. First BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Carlson v. Old Republic InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. BaerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Haney v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Integon National Insurance v. VillafrancoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013