Legal Opinion

Clayton Bros. v. Littlefield

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1922No. Nos. 353-3085PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, P. J.

Plaintiffs in error sued defendants in error^to recover damages on account of the alleged failure of the latter *510to deliver certain calves, in keeping with a contract between the parties.

The undisputed facts together with the facts found by the jury briefly are that defendants in error were to deliver to plaintiffs in error all the calves, with certain specified exceptions, dropped in 1015 up to September 15th, on certain ranches of defendants in error, and the 1914 calves which were unbranded at the date of the contract. Delivery of the calves was to begin on October 15, 1915, and continue…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brinker v. Wobaco Trust Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Herzstein v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Industrial Lumber Co. v. Northside Lumber & Building Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API