Dalby v. Wolf
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Jones District Court. relied upon Santo et al. v. The State of Iowa, 2 Iowa, 203. cited Geebriclc v. The State of Iowa, 5 Iowa, 491; River v. Foster, 4 Harr., 492; Thorne v. Kramer, 15 Barb., 112 ; Bradley v. Baxter, Id., 192.
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
Plaintiff declares in trespass for that defendants wrongfully took and drove away certain personal property, belonging to said plaintiff, of the value, &e. The second clause of the answer, justifying, avers that the county of Jones, on the first Monday in April, 1855, did, by a majority vote, on a question duly submitted, decide in favor of restraining swine and sheep from running at large; that after this, the property in question (swine) was found running at large, upon the premises of the defendant Palmer, who gave notice to his co-defendant Wolf, a constable, that Palmer took them into…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Santo v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
- Thorne v. CramerNew York Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by19 opinions
- Eckerson v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Shaw v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- State v. Judge of the Circuit CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
- State ex rel. Witter v. ForknerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- People ex rel. Rhodes v. FlemingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.