Legal Opinion

Allicia v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 27, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of tort in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for the alleged conscious suffering of his intestate, Philomena Allicia, caused by the alleged wilful, wanton and reckless conduct on the part of the defendant, its agents or servants, in the running, operating and managing of one of its trains. The defendant’s answer is a general denial, and allegations that the plaintiff’s intestate was not in the exercise of due care, that she was guilty of gross negligence, that she was trespassing upon the property of the defendant at the time of the accident, and that she was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Pittsfield Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Mears v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sargent v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Fialkow v. DeVoe Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Edgarton v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Carr v. Arthur D. Little, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Coburn v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API