Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

General Electric Co. v. De Forest Radio Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 23, 1928No. 3654Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBuffington, Circuit Judge

In this court’s holding the process claims valid and infringed I concur. From its holding the product claims invalid I dissent. In view of the importance of the case to the litigants and of the patent principles involved, I record my views at length.

Confronted by the vast amount of testimony in this ease, let me settle what is the actual thing, the issue, these parties are fighting about. It is a tungsten wire. If I bear this tungsten wire in mind it will bring to this suit the same, clear light that wire brought to the electric light art. I squarely face the controversy- when I say that as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edison Electric Light Co. v. Boston Incandescent Lamp Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1894
  2. Sawyer Spindle Co. v. W. G. & A. R. Morrison Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API