Pickeral v. Federal Land Bank
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.
In this case we are concerned with three trials which sought the same objective, namely, the establishment of a boundary line between the land of the plaintiff in error and that of the defendants in error. This, in turn, determines the title to about three acres of land ■in Pittsylvania county, Virginia. The Federal Land Bank and James and Esther Waller were parties defendant in the last two trials. The Wallers were parties defendant in the first trial. The latter held the land under a contract of sale with the Federal Land Bank, therefore, the bank was a party inferentially and by…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
- Bradshaw v. BoothSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Linkous v. StevensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
- Douglas Land Co. v. T. W. Thayer Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912
- Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. FerebeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Bates v. DeversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- Walter B. Graves v. Associated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Lee v. SpodenSupreme Court of Virginia · 2015
- Patterson v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Whitley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.