People v. Sexton
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH
After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of two counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault and one count of aggravated criminal sexual abuse. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, pars. 12 — 14(b)(1), 12— 16(c)(1).) Defendant argues he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and that the trial court erred in admitting: (1) the State’s Attorney’s testimony; (2) hearsay testimony under the corroborative complaint and treating physician’s exceptions to the hearsay rule; and (3) a photograph of complainant’s genital area. Defendant argues his due process rights to a fair trial were violated…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. LindgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. ShumIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. FriedmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. FrieslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. GantIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. TerrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- People v. WassonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.