Legal Opinion

Quirk v. Sanders

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 1984No. 44056PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

Plaintiff, T.M. Quirk (Quirk), brought an unlawful detainer action against Robert and Yvonne Sanders (Sanders) to gain possession of property that Quirk had purchased at an execution sale. The Sanders had defaulted on a loan obtained from General Electric Finance Co., d/b/a Homemakers Loan and Discount Corp. (Homemakers). Homemakers obtained a default judgment against the Sanders and had execution levied on the Sanders’ property. Quirk purchased the property at the execution sale, and the Sanders’ rights to the property were conveyed to him by a sheriff’s deed.

After a jury waived…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Flanigan v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. McNeill v. McNeillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Koch v. BOARD OF REGENTS, ETCMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Spalding v. MayhallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. P.M. Construction Services, Inc. v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Rogers v. BrocklandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Bobbitt v. OggMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Danielle Goser v. David BoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API