Legal Opinion

Miller v. Durrill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1936No. 24306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Eor convenience! we refer to the parties as they appeared below; plaintiff in error as defendant and defendant in error as plaintiff.

This is an action wherein the plaintiff, receiver of land incumbered by mortgage, asked that the defendants, representatives of the State Highway Department, and then-agents, employees and workmen, be restrained and enjoined from entering upon and appropriating any of such land until the same is condemned as by law provided, or a fall- agreement respecting the matter is arrived at.

The facts are as follows: David A. Crooks and Flossy Crooks owned 40 acres of land…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Morse v. Board of Com'rs of Marshall CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abrams v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Abrams v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API