United States v. Bishop
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING SENTENCING
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On September 8, 2004, a jury found Defendant Daniel Ralph Bishop guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Immediately following the verdict, Mr. Bishop asked to be released pending the imposition of sentence, and the Government objected. This Court ruled on September 8, 2004 that Mr. Bishop failed to meet the criteria set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) and ordered him detained. On October 7, 2004, Mr. Bishop filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Anthony FioreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. MulkernCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BishopDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- United States v. NeddDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006