Legal Opinion

United States v. Boston Scientific Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 8, 2002No. CIV.A. 00-12247-PBSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARIS, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation has moved for reconsideration as to Count V. The essence of Boston Scientific’s argument is that it did not violate the Interim Supply Provision of the FTC Order between March 1998 and May 1998 because the Discovery 2.6F/40 Mhz catheter, as redesigned, was first sold to customers on June 3, 1998, after the supply provision had expired. After hearing, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

DISCUSSION

The Interim Supply Provision of the FTC Order reads:

Respondent shall supply to the Licensee, for such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API