United States v. Boston Scientific Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation has moved for reconsideration as to Count V. The essence of Boston Scientific’s argument is that it did not violate the Interim Supply Provision of the FTC Order between March 1998 and May 1998 because the Discovery 2.6F/40 Mhz catheter, as redesigned, was first sold to customers on June 3, 1998, after the supply provision had expired. After hearing, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED.
DISCUSSION
The Interim Supply Provision of the FTC Order reads:
Respondent shall supply to the Licensee, for such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001