Legal Opinion

Coronet Insurance v. Solarz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 14, 1986No. 84—2703PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE BUCKLEY

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Coronet Insurance Company (Coronet), brought a declaratory judgment action to determine whether it was obligated to provide coverage for an accident involving the defendants. Both Coronet and the defendants thereafter filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Following a hearing, the trial court denied Coronet’s motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, declaring as a matter of law that coverage was provided. Coronet appeals the ruling. For the following reasons, we affirm.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States Fire Insurance v. SchnackenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Management Support Associates v. Union Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Man. Sup. Assoc. v. Union Indem. Ins.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Murphy v. PetersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Makela v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Travelers Insurance v. BodohAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API