Coronet Insurance v. Solarz
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE BUCKLEY
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff, Coronet Insurance Company (Coronet), brought a declaratory judgment action to determine whether it was obligated to provide coverage for an accident involving the defendants. Both Coronet and the defendants thereafter filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Following a hearing, the trial court denied Coronet’s motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, declaring as a matter of law that coverage was provided. Coronet appeals the ruling. For the following reasons, we affirm.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Fire Insurance v. SchnackenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Management Support Associates v. Union Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Man. Sup. Assoc. v. Union Indem. Ins.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Murphy v. PetersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Makela v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Travelers Insurance v. BodohAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988