Legal Opinion

State v. Washington

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1986No. 83-1804-CRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

There are two issues in this case:(1) Was the defendant lawfully arrested after the police found evidence of a burglary on his person during a pat-down search for weapons?(2) What are the limitations and ramifications of the inevitable discovery doctrine?

Defendant, Jonas M. Washington, was arrested for the burglary of Sedlar’s Jewelry Store in Wauwatosa. Washington brought a motion to suppress certain evidence seized during the stop and arrest. The Honorable William J. Haese, in a Milwaukee county circuit court suppression hearing, held the arrest was legal and its fruits were legally seized…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. State v. GuyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. SwansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. McGillWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API