Legal Opinion

Claim of D'Errico v. New York City Department of Corrections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 20, 2009Published

1Dissent

Garry, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. While fully recognizing that our review is significantly limited in scope, we nonetheless find that remittal is required. Contrary to the majority’s assertion, this finding is not in any manner related to the underlying merits of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s determination, which we clearly may not and do not reach, but rather on a narrow procedural ground wholly consistent with the legal authority cited by the majority.

We find that the Board panel failed to adequately consider and address the legal standard applied in its determination that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Claim of Dukes v. Capitol Formation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Claim of Pinto v. Southport Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Claim of Pecora v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Claim of Wariner v. Associated PressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Robinson v. Interstate National DealerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API