Legal Opinion

Redfield v. Eaton

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 13, 1931No. 3488PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

In this ease the plaintiff claims recovery of tax assessed upon his income without deduction for personal loans aggregating $3,113, which he claims to have made in part in 1926 and in part in 1927, and which he claims to have charged off as worthless in 1927. The loans were shown ■ as deductions on his return; were disallowed by the Commissioner and assessed against the plaintiff, resulting in an additional tax amounting to $418.87. This amount was exacted from the' plaintiff together with interest thereon in the amount of $53.59, and paid by the plaintiff on May 26,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Avery v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  2. Selden v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. American Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Scovill Manufacturing Company v. John J. Fitzpatrick, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. WF Young, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  3. H.J. Baker & Bro., Inc. v. Orgonics, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  4. Hamlen v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  5. Moore v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API