Frink v. Roe
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco.'
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
The sale under-the execution issued on the judgment in Smith v. City of San Francisco was regular, and passed all the title which the city had on the day of sale.The sheriff’s deed passed such title to the purchaser, and such title came regularly by proper conveyances and vested in D. B. Rising, under whom both of the parties to this action claim. While Rising held the title, he executed to James H. Hodgdon a deed of release and quitclaim, bearing date the 30th of March, 1853, which was recorded on the same day, by which, for a consideration of seven thousand nine hundred dollars, he conveyed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Barr v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Hayward v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- McFadden v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re DePassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Hyder v. HyderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957