Legal Opinion

T. M. Britt and Jane Britt v. The United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1970No. 27310PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

This tax refund case involves the difficult application of the rule that income from property must be taxed to the individual who, in substance, is the owner of the property generating the income. Helvering v. Horst, 1940, 311 U.S. 112, 61 S.Ct. 144, 85 L.Ed. 75. Here, the taxpayers transferred the property in question to three corporations. The district court found that as a matter of law the level of business activity was not sufficient to require recognition of the corporations as separate taxable entities. The district court therefore disregarded the existence of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Strong v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Clougherty Packing Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Hospital Corp. of America v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  5. Jones v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API