Lingo v. the State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Presiding Judge.
James Lingo appeals his conviction for robbery,1 arguing that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of his gang affiliation. We agree, but nevertheless affirm because Lingo has failed to establish harm.
On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and an appellant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. This Court determines whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia,[2] and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility. Any conflicts or inconsistencies…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Serge EdouardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Rankin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- United States v. Juan Delgado, Emilio Albelo, Juan Carlos Riverol, Tomas Raul HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anglin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Shaw v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Entwisle v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Anglin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.