Legal Opinion

Texaco Refining & Marketing Inc. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 31, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal poses the single question of the number of votes required for the Envi*1147ronmental Appeals Board (“Board”) to reverse a decision of the Secretary of the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (“Secretary”). In construing the applicable statute, the Superior Court ruled that four of the seven members were required to vote to override a decision of the Secretary. We agree with this interpretation and affirm.

I

This matter originated in the effort by Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc. (“Texaco”) to secure a temporary emergency variance from certain pollution standards…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. McDermott Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  3. Nationwide Insurance Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  2. Glazer v. PasternakSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. Tulou v. Raytheon Service Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Gregory B. Maffei v. Dennis PalkonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025
  5. In the Matter of the Jeremy Paradise Dynasty Trust and The Andrew Paradise Dynasty TrustCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API