Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Mayfield

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1921No. 164-3163PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

On November 15, 1906, J. E. Mayfield conveyed to Alfred Tullos a certain tract of land, retaining a vendor’s lien to secure the payment of three notes for the sum of $43.75 each, executed by Tullos, payable £o Mayfield, due one, two, and three years after date, respectively. Mayfield transferred the notes to A. A. Richards in 1910, who in turn, in 1912, transferred them *1098to Mrs. Kate Mayfield, wife of J. E. May-field.

On January 11, 1916, Mrs. Mayfield, joined by ber husband, sued Tullos and his tenant in trespass to try title to the land on which the vendor’s lien had been retained; the cause…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gardener v. Griffith, ExecutorsTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Ward v. Green, GuardianTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Tullos v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Stratton v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schwarz v. National Loan & Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. White v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Cantu v. BageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Golden West Oil Co. No. 1 v. Golden Rod Oil Co. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Arroyo-Colorado Nav. Dist. of Cameron v. State Nat. Bank of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API