Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 1, 2013No. Supreme Court Case No. 10SC146Published

1DissentJustice Marquez

1121 I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes in this case that the "context" of the interaction between an offender and victim during an assault is not only relevant, but dispositive to determining whether the offender was a "stranger" for purposes of designating the offender a sexually violent predator ("SVP"). I disagree. The term "stranger" in section 18-8-414.5(1)(a)(IID), C.R.S. (2012), looks strictly to the existing relationship (or lack thereof) between the offender and victim. Importantly, the nature of this relationship does not vary with a victim's ability to identify the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  2. People v. HunterColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API