Legal Opinion

City of Sterling v. Berry

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1937No. 24171. Cause transferredPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

The appellant was, in the city court of Sterling, fined the sum of $3 for permitting his dog to go at large in the city of Sterling without the payment of a registration fee, herein called a tax, as required by certain ordinances of the city of Sterling. He raised in that court questions affecting the constitutionality of such ordinances and brings the cause here on direct appeal on the ground that constitutional questions are involved. The trial judge certified that in his opinion such questions were involved, and that it was in the public interest that the appeal be taken directly to this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cole v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. City of Paxton v. FitzsimmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People Ex Rel. Sweitzer v. GillIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Burns v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Chicago Heights v. Public Service Co. of Northern IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  2. First National Bank v. Village of South PekinIllinois Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API