Legal Opinion
American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association, Inc. v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 4, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0697PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff — the American Orthotic & Prosthetic Association, Inc. (“AOPA”) — is an association of individual suppliers of prosthetic devices to Medicare patients who have lost limbs to disease or injury. Consistent with its mission to secure “favorable treatment of the orthotic and prosthetic business in laws, regulations, and services,” Compl. ¶ 11, AOPA filed the present action seeking declaratory, injunc-tive, and mandamus relief against Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Association for Home Care & Hospice, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Am. Hosp. Ass'n v. HarganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- American Hospital Association v. Eric D. HarganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Hmh Hospitals Corporation v. BecerraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Inogen, Inc. v. AzarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.