Legal Opinion

East Ramapo Central School District v. Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 2016PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the final judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner commenced this summary proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 713 (7), alleging that occupant had been in occupancy pursuant to a series of short-term permits, and an addendum to permit, for various durations, beginning in November 2006, with the last permit expiring December 31, 2010; that occupant had violated the use clause of the permits and the addendum to permit; and that a 10-day notice to quit had been served. Following a nonjury trial, a final judgment was entered in favor of petitioner.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adams v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Greenwood Lake & Port Jervis Railroad v. New York & Greenwood Lake RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. American Jewish Theatre, Inc. v. Roundabout Theatre Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Union Square Park Community Coalition, Inc. v. New York City Department of Parks & RecreationNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Douglass v. SeiferdAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. South Brooklyn Ry. Co. v. Heung Man Lau, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County2024
  2. South Brooklyn Ry. Co. v. Heung Man Lau, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API