Legal Opinion

Colgrove v. Hayden Lake Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This is essentially an action for damages for failure to deliver water for irrigation purposes. From the record it appears that appellant and her husband purchased ten acres of land in Kootenai county, together with a water right, from the Interstate Irrigation Company, a corporation, which later became the separate property of appellant by divorce proceedings. Subsequent to the purchase respondent district was organized and took over the irrigation system of the Interstate Irrigation Company. Appellant brought this action to recover damages from respondent for the latter’s alleged failure to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Adams v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Later v. HaywoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Kroetch v. Empire Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
  4. McAlinden v. St. Maries Hospital Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Small v. HarringtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Stearns Ex Rel. Stearns v. GravesIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Evans v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Carver v. KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API