Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Penn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 1989No. 617PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this case we are called up to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion and committed reversible error in closing a trial to the public during the testimony of a Commonwealth witness who alleged that he had been threatened and harassed by unidentified persons who did not want him to testify against appellant at his murder trial. For the reasons which follow, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

The relevant facts may be accurately summarized as follows. Appellant was arrested and brought to trial on murder charges relating to the shooting death of his estranged…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. GarciaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Terrance Tucker v. Superintendent Graterford SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Cooley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API