Fickes v. Baker
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought for the reformation of a deed executed by the testator in his lifetime. It was found by the court that at the time of his death the de ceased was the owner and in the possession of property described as lot No. 6 in block No. 10, in the town of Winters, county of Yolo, that he made no disposition of it by his will; that on the thirty-first day of July, 1912, said Cradwick executed a certain deed of conveyance to the plaintiffs, granting a certain lot of land contiguous to the parcel here in controversy; that “said deed was by its express terms made, executed, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Enos v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Willey v. HodgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Tuthill v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Johnson v. AustinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Laundreville v. MeroMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Reina v. ErassarretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951