Legal Opinion

Schatzkis v. Rosenwald & Weil

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1932No. Gen. No. 35,807PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Keener

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff, Frieda Schatzkis, brought an action in assumpsit to recover upon a bond executed by defendant. The case was tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a finding for the defendant and a judgment against the plaintiff for costs, and plaintiff appealed.

The amended statement of claim alleged that plaintiff was the legal owner of bond No. 1505 for $1,000, executed by the defendant, the bond being part of a series of 1,800 bonds aggregating $850,000; that default was made in the payment of the semiannual interest…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rohrer v. DeatherageIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Tomlinson v. EarnshawIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Curran v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Brewer v. Penn Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. Goldstein v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sahadi v. Continental Illinois National BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Sahadi v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  4. Borker v. BendixAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  5. Dillon v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API