State v. Greco

Peter Albert Greco appeals from a judgment and sentence entered upon a verdict of guilty on a charge of grand larceny and, by multiple assignments of error, raises the single issue of the legality of the search of his automobile without a warrant.

Review of the evidence is unnecessary because no questions arise as to its sufficiency, the admission or rejection of evidence, or the instructions.

By timely motion before trial, supported by his own affidavit, appellant moved to suppress the evidence seized as the result of the search of his automobile, because the police had no warrant therefor. By…