Heiny v. State

CHIPMAN, Judge.

The appellant-defendant, Kim Heiny, was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit burglary, a Class C felony. On appeal Heiny challenges several rulings made by the trial court. We reverse.

Heiny has raised the following issue:

Whether the trial court erred in denying his Motion to Quash the information based on its failure to state the offense with sufficient certainty.

Heiny also raises several other issues but since we reverse on the failure to grant the Motion to Quash, they need not be discussed. 1

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the State are summarized below. Heiny and…