Legal Opinion

Perez v. Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1993No. 92-947PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtA. William Sweeney, J.

The determinative issue posed in this appeal is whether appellants’ complaint for declaratory relief brought pursuant to R.C. 2721.02 for relief pursuant to 313.19 presents a justiciable claim for relief. For the reasons that follow, we hold that appellants have stated a cause of action under R.C. 313.19, and, therefore, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this action for further proceedings.

R.C. 313.19 provides as follows:

“The cause of death and the manner and mode in which the death occurred, as delivered by the coroner and incorporated in the coroner’s verdict and in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Vargo v. Travelers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Goldsby v. GerberOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State, Ex Rel. Dana v. GerberOhio Court of Appeals · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Sherrills v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Garofalo v. Chicago Title InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Lindenschmidt v. Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1995

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API