Legal Opinion

Armour v. Doig

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Tbks cane was decided bv Division A. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval County.

1Opinion of the Court

*164STATEMENT.

On May 17th, 1898, plaintiff in error sued Harry A. Henry in assumpsit, and on the same day filed affidavit in garnishment, upon which writ of garnishment was sued out and served the same day on D. H. Doig, as garnishee. On July 4th, 1898, Doig answered the writ of garnishment saying “that he is not indebted to the said defendant, nor was he so indebted at the time of service of said writ, nor at any time between'the service of said writ and filing of this answer. That he has no money, goods, chatties, credits or effects of the said defendant in his hands, possession or control, nor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Montgomery v. KnoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  4. C. B. Rogers Co. v. Meinhardt Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1896
  5. Coursey v. . MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Home Insurance v. PutnalSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Laberge v. VancleaveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API