Legal Opinion

Roland J. Hickey v. Herman Solem, Warden, and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South Dakota

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1984No. 83-1877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Roland J. Hickey appeals from a final judgment of the District Court 1 for the District of South Dakota denying his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For reversal appellant argues that the district court erred in finding (1) that his right to due process was not denied as the result of alleged contacts between the jurors and relatives of the man appellant was on trial for killing; and (2) that the prosecutor’s failure to furnish a copy of a witness’s statement was not improper because nothing in that statement was material to appellant’s guilt or punishment. We affirm.

Hickey…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. David Scurr, Warden of the Iowa State Penitentiary, Appellant-Cross v. Michael Charles Niccum, Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Otis Thompson, Jr. v. State of Missouri, John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Donald W. Wyrick, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. HickeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MesserlianDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API