Legal Opinion
United States v. Hester
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1943No. 2669PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The principal question presented by this appeal is whether certain restricted, but taxable, Indian lands in Oklahoma can be sold by the State for delinquent ad valorem taxes as other lands in that State. Section 4 of the Act of May 10, 1928, 45 Stat. 495, 496, provides in part: “That on and after April 26, 1931, the allotted, inherited, and devised restricted lands of each Indian of the Five Civilized Tribes in excess of one hundred and sixty acres shall be subject to taxation by the State of Oklahoma undor and in accordance with the laws of that State, and in all…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- The Kansas IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Matter of HeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Indian Country, U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Franchise Tax Board Of The State Of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust For Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Murphy v. SirmonsDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2007
- Wells v. MalloyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.