Legal Opinion

Dover v. Amer. Reduction Co. (Et Al.)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1941No. Appeal, 167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This is a distressing case, but it must be decided in accordance with the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Our sympathies cannot justify an award not warranted by the law. It is complicated by the fact that the defendant changed insurance carriers, and, of course, one insurer cannot be held liable for disability resulting from .accidents that occurred before it assumed liability: Miller v. Textor Transfer Co., 106 Pa. Superior Ct. 38, 161 A. 442. The causal connection between the particular accident and the disability claimed must be established by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Miller v. Textor Transfer Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Miller v. Textor Transfer Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mosley v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Miles v. GallagherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API