Legal Opinion

Allen v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Flaintiff s decedent, an employee of a traveling carnival, was injured while preparing an amusement ride for use at a carnival on City-owned property. Contrary to plaintiffs contention, the decedent was not engaged in the erection of a structure as contemplated by Labor Law § 240 (1). He was installing scenery panels as a backdrop to the ride, which came prebuilt (see Hodges v Boland’s Excavating & Topsoil, Inc., 24 AD3d 1089, 1091-1092 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 710 [2006]; Munoz v DJZ Realty, LLC, 5 NY3d 747 [2005]; Adair v Bestek Light. & Staging Corp., 298 AD2d 153 [2002]).

We have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Munoz v. DJZ Realty, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Adair v. Bestek Lighting & Staging Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Hodges v. Boland's Excavating & Topsoil, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andino v. Wizards Studios N. Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  2. Andino v. Wizards Studios N. Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  3. Lopez v. 6071 Enters., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API