Eubank v. Eubank
Amherst County Circuit Court
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge J. Michael Gamble
I am writing this letter to furnish you with a decision on the issues argued in this case. First, I find that the paper writing of Sallie M. Eubank dated September 10, 1997, is a valid holographic codicil to the Last Will and Testament of Sallie M. Eubank dated March 14, 1977. I further find that this holographic codicil was not revoked by the codicil of Sallie M. Eubank dated February 14, 2002. My reasons for these rulings are set forth below.
A “codicil” is an instrument “made subsequent to a will and modifying it in some respects, forming part of it and superseding…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Quesenberry v. FunkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Poindexter v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- Gillespie v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Thomas v. CopenhaverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Gordon v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.