Legal Opinion

Eubank v. Eubank

Amherst County Circuit Court

Decided February 22, 2005No. Case No. CH04010035Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge J. Michael Gamble

I am writing this letter to furnish you with a decision on the issues argued in this case. First, I find that the paper writing of Sallie M. Eubank dated September 10, 1997, is a valid holographic codicil to the Last Will and Testament of Sallie M. Eubank dated March 14, 1977. I further find that this holographic codicil was not revoked by the codicil of Sallie M. Eubank dated February 14, 2002. My reasons for these rulings are set forth below.

A “codicil” is an instrument “made subsequent to a will and modifying it in some respects, forming part of it and superseding…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Quesenberry v. FunkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  2. Poindexter v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  3. Gillespie v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  4. Thomas v. CopenhaverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  5. Gordon v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API