Legal Opinion

Niehaus v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 18, 1960No. Docket No. 74622Unpublished

Held, where petitioners made loans evidence by notes to a corporation in which one petitioner was an officer and major shareholder, under the facts of the case, the unpaid balance of the loans was a nonbusiness bad debt within the meaning of section 166(d) of the I.R.C. of 1954 rather than a business bad debt under section 166(a) or a loss under section 165(c).

1Opinion of the Court

Frank H. Niehaus and Margaret Niehaus v. Commissioner.

Niehaus v. Commissioner

Docket No. 74622.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1960-42; 1960 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 247; 19 T.C.M. (CCH) 217; T.C.M. (RIA) 60042;

March 18, 1960

Held, where petitioners made loans evidence by notes to a corporation in which one petitioner was an officer and major shareholder, under the facts of the case, the unpaid balance of the loans was a nonbusiness bad debt within the meaning of section 166(d) of the I.R.C. of 1954 rather than a business bad debt under section 166(a) or a loss under section 165(c).

Francis C. Flynn,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burnet v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Dalton v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Boissevain v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  4. Berwind v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  5. Samuel Towers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and Three Related CasesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API