Legal Opinion

Moock v. Emanuel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (S. Schwartz, J.), entered January 6, 1984, directing, inter alia, that (i) certain partnership records be produced and (ii) Eric Emanuel submit to oral examination, modified, on the law and the facts, by striking the direction to examine Eric Emanuel, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, f Generally, disclosure *1004will not be ordered in aid of arbitration except under extraordinary circumstances (CPLR 3102, subd [c]; De Sapio v Kohlmeyer, 35 NY2d 402,406; Matter of Katz v State of New York Dept, of Correctional Serus., 64 AD2d 900). Petitioner Moock…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WernickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Katz v. State of New York Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oriental Commercial & Shipping Co. v. Rosseel, N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. Hendler & Murray, P. C. v. LambertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Goldsborough v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Kramer v. GeldwertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API