Legal Opinion

State v. Pate

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court. — Hon. G. Porter, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

— The defendant was indicted at the Octo*489ber term, 1874, of the Montgomery circuit court, for keeping a billiard table without license. The grand jury was summoned for the said October term, hut, on the 29th of October, 1874, the court adjourned to the first day of December, 1874, when, as it appears from the record, the indictment was found by the grand jury summoned for the said October term.

1.GRAND JURY: adjurned term. Defendant’s counsel contend that the adjournment discharged the grand jury, and that their authority then ceased, and cite, in support of that view, Dulle v. Deimler, 28 Mo.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BleekleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  2. State v. WelchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  3. Dulle v. DeimlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  4. State v. ByrneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. State v. RandolphMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Kirk v. Henry M. Rich & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  5. Cooper v. SchoeberleinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API