Legal Opinion

Koerner v. Wilkinson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 11, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Ho». Walter B. Douglas, Judge. (1) The statute of 1895 is intended to he exclusive respecting'the modes of ratification of contracts made during infancy, and the common law is not thereby revived.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Ho». Walter B. Douglas, Judge. (1) The statute of 1895 is intended to he exclusive respecting'the modes of ratification of contracts made during infancy, and the common law is not thereby revived. R. S. 1899, see. 3423; Sutherland on Stat. Construction, sec. 140; R. S. 1899, sec. 4177; State v. Slaughter, 70 Mo. 484.- (2) Defendant’s conduct after coming of age did not constitute a ratification under the statute of 1895. Wearing the clothing after coming of age was not “disposing” of them within the meaning of the statute. State ex rel. v. State…

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

Plaintiff sued defendant before a justice of the peace by the filing of the following-account :

“ EVERALL BROS.

TAILORS.

‘“George Everall,

James H. Mannigan,

Norman L. Archer. 236 Fifth Ave.

“New York, May 29,1901.

£ £ Sold to W. Tudor Wilkinson, Esq.,

Missouri Trust Co., 7th and Locust Sts.

1900.

March 28, Dark gray cheviot D. B. sack suit, lined silk........................ 70'

Pair white Kahrker riding breeches.. 23

White duck D. B: vest............... 14

Oct. 3, Oxford worsted dress suit, lined satin. 100

Pair .of - extra trousers ....:......... 20

Gray plaid cheviot sack suit, lined silk 70

Gray silk…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Tarkio v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Green v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Craig v. Van BebberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Henry v. . RootNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Brantley v. WolfMississippi Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Springfield Plywood Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  2. Popp v. MungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Byers v. Lemay Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Olsen v. SundlingMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Fenn v. Hart Dairy Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API