Legal Opinion

Gass v. Hilson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1990No. 89-358PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Mary Jo Gass, plaintiff and appellant, appeals from the denial of her motion for a new trial entered by the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, pursuant to Rule 59(d), M.R.Civ.P. We affirm.

The issue raised on appeal is whether the District Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial based on plaintiff’s conten tion that damages awarded were inadequate when viewed in the light of the evidence submitted.

On September 2, 1984, Mary Jo Gass, a 37-year-old buyer for a diversified agricultural business, was approaching a red light in a Great Falls…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Town Pump, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. O'BRIEN v. Great Northern Railroad CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bohrer v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Tompkins v. Northwestern Union Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Tope v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Giambra v. KelseyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Delaware v. K-Decorators, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Mason v. DitzelMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Thompson v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Brockie v. Omo Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API