Legal Opinion

Petersen v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons and Paroles

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2018No. 28449PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice *842 [¶1.] The South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles adjudicated a prison inmate's initial parole-eligibility date, and the inmate did not appeal. Two years later, the inmate requested the Board to reconsider. The Board declined, and the inmate filed an administrative appeal in circuit court. The circuit court concluded it lacked subject matter jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal with prejudice. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶2.] Mary Petersen is an inmate in the South Dakota Women's Prison. After being convicted of additional felonies while in prison, the Board of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Servs. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. In Re Real Estate Tax Exemption for Black Hills Legal Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. McCann v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Iron Shell v. Warden, Mike Durfee State PrisonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API