Legal Opinion

Rosenfield v. Metals Selling Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 28, 1994No. 14697PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The principal issue in this appeal and cross appeal is, under the facts of the case, the extent to which the business judgment rule shields a corporate officer from liability for depletion of corporate assets. This appeal is the culmination of a business dispute between two brothers, the plaintiff, Raymond Rosenfield, and the defendant Norman Rosenfield.1 The dispute involved two close corporations, the defend*774ants Metals Selling Corporation (Metals Selling) and Metalmast Marine, Inc. (Metalmast), owned and managed by the Rosenfields. Norman appeals and Raymond cross appeals from the judgment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. BittingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. SurabianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Harbor Marine Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Cuker v. MikalauskasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Murphy v. WakeleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Ostrowski v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API