Legal Opinion
Aulicino v. Kaiser
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 18, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Ulster County (Mizel, J.), entered June 28, 2006, which, among other things, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 4, partially denied respondent’s objections to an order of support.
The parties are the parents of a son, born in 1992. Petitioner seeks a pro rata contribution from respondent toward parochial school education for the child. Following a hearing, a Support Magistrate rejected respondent’s contention that he had not consented to placement of the child in a parochial school and ordered respondent to pay a portion of the child’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Manno v. MannoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Carr v. CarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Fruchter v. FruchterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Wen v. WenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Llamas v. LlamasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zwickel v. SzajerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Kristina P. v. Joseph Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Kristina P. v. Joseph Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014